![]() There are reasons to think that no such account can be successful. In the bulk of this article I shall explore various problems with the Hayman and Pratt definition, and then briefly suggest some lessons for thinking about the medium of comics. Like Hayman and Pratt and others who have written on the topic, I will assume that the extension of the concept comic is fairly diverse. a brief history of recent attempts to define comics It includes comic strips, comic books, graphic novels, one-off comics, serials, and webcomics.Ī brief survey of past attempts to define the medium will help place the Hayman and Pratt account in context. In this section I discuss four recent attempts to provide a definition of comics and suggest that they all suffer from glaring difficulties. The Hayman and Pratt proposal might, therefore, be seen as a significant advance in the definitional project. ![]() Its failures are then particularly telling. ![]() In the first volume of his exhaustive history of the comic strip, David Kunzle proposes the following definition of that category: a comic strip consists of “a sequence of separate images” with “a preponderance of image over text” that appears (and was originally intended to appear) in “a mass medium” and tells “a story which is both moral and topical.” 4 4ĭavid Kunzle, The Early Comic Strip: Narrative Strips and Picture Stories in the European Broadsheet from c. 1450 to 1825 (University of California Press, 1973), p. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |